Lesson map
Lesson 19. Map, example, EX065.
flowchart TD
W["Words in the adoption passage"] --> S["Six scripts, none of which print those words"]
S --> K["Keep the words in the plan"]
K --> R["Do not paint them into a lab line"]
A figure can be true of the story and still be absent from every stdout.
Logical drawing
prose, not a column:
10 users, 2,400 drafts, human click to send
30-day retention, review above €500
admin-switch drill in 3 minutes
mailboxes T1–T5, dates 12–26 October
none of the six scripts prints those tokens
Learning outcomes
After this chapter, you should be able to:
- List the pilot figures that live only in sentences.
- Say that the six scripts' prints were already taught in the earlier lessons.
- Reject a lab line that grows a new field for drafts or euros.
19.1 The adoption paragraph records decisions. The scripts record calculations.
After the four-week draft-only pilot the prose says 10 users produced 2,400 drafts and that no message was sent by the assistant. Wider use still requires a person to click send. New external domains get a warning. ReceiptSort goes to a person when the amount is above €500 or the confidence is low. The first incident step is an admin switch, and a drill completed that step in 3 minutes. The vendor's answers in the worked example include no training on customer data, 30-day retention, and a switch that blocks external sharing. The written scope names mailboxes T1–T5 and the dates 12–26 October.
None of those integers is a format field. Lab S prints Wilson rows, five seed rates, and one bootstrap line. Lab H prints three prefixes and three status words. Lab I prints four defence rows. Lab E prints weights and five eps lines. Lab R prints three bucket lines. Lab B prints nine precision lines. A search of those prints does not find 2400, 500, 3 minutes, a 30-day string, T1, or an October date.
The figures still matter. They are the plan. They simply are not measurements the six files computed. Writing drafts=2400 beside a Wilson row, or eur=500 beside an eps line, would forge a column.
Lesson table; scroll horizontally to read all columns →
| Figure | Home | Absent from |
|---|---|---|
| 2,400 drafts | Adoption paragraph | All six prints |
| €500 review | ReceiptSort sentence | The eps lines |
| 3-minute drill | Incident sentence | The bucket lines |
| T1–T5 and 12–26 October | Scope sentence | Every script |
19.2 Worked example
Lesson table; scroll horizontally to read all columns →
| Someone adds this to a printout | Decision |
|---|---|
drafts=2400 on the Wilson page |
Refuse |
retention=30 on the hash page |
Refuse |
| The same numbers, left in the adoption paragraph | Keep |
| A new seventh script to "confirm" the drill time | Refuse; the drill is a sentence |
Synthetic case. Ten users and 2,400 drafts describe the invented firm. They are not a log extract.
Errors and limits
A round number in a story is memorable, which makes it easy to promote into a column it never occupied.
Apply
- EX065 — Prose figures. Which Tallis figures must stay in sentences, and what would a forged column look like?
Show marking criteria
Rubric: 3 = 2,400 drafts, ten users, the human click, 30-day retention, €500, the 3-minute drill, T1–T5 and 12–26 October stay prose; none of the six scripts prints them;; 2 = lists the figures and names the scripts;; 1 = one figure;; 0 = writes them into a lab line.