One export does not certify the other tills | Rapid course Privacy and data protection

Open, free learning for anyone who wants to protect people and technology. No account is required to read this text or its worked answers.

Lesson map

Lesson 11 published. Map, example, EX065.

flowchart TD
  O["The owner approved the plan for Juniper"] --> E["One export was checked"]
  E --> T{"Has each other shop's till been checked?"}
  T -->|No| R["Do not copy the first result across"]
  T -->|Yes| K["Cite each export"]

Three shops do not become one file.

Logical drawing

Juniper
    three shops
    about 9,000 regular customers, not split in the file
owner
    approved the five actions
two-week file
    one form, one export
        |
        +-- approval is not a check of every till
        +-- the first export stays the first export
        +-- shop names are not invented

Learning outcomes

After this chapter, you should be able to:

Keep the owner's approval as a decision for the business.
Refuse to paste one till export onto the other two shops.
Leave the customer figure unsplit.

11.1 Approval and verification are different sentences

The owner approved the five actions for Juniper. The two-week check then describes one sign-up form and one till export. Juniper has three shops. Nothing in the review file says the same export was taken from the other two tills. A classmate writes "all shops passed" beside the first result. Sofia leaves the other two tills unchecked in the log. She does not divide the figure of about 9,000 regular customers by shop, and she does not name the shops. The first export remains evidence about the file she opened.

11.2 Worked example

Lesson table; scroll horizontally to read all columns →

Note someone wants to add	What the file shows	Decision
"The owner approved the five actions."	The presentation	Keep it
"This export had no medicine name."	One file	Keep it as that file
"So the other two tills match."	No second or third export	Do not write that
A headcount per shop	The file gives one business figure	Do not split it

Synthetic case. The shops stay unnamed. About 9,000 stays the business figure.

Errors and limits

Saying a till is unchecked is not a finding that it sends medicine names. That would be a guess. A later export, if taken, is its own line.

Apply

EX065 — How many tills were opened? The owner approved the plan. One export shows totals and non-medicine categories. The other two shops have no export in the log. What may the note say, and what figure stays whole?
Show marking criteria
Rubric: 3 = the approval stands; the one export does not certify the other tills; do not split about 9,000 customers; do not name the shops;; 2 = one export is not three, and the figure stays whole;; 1 = one of those;; 0 = none.