OpenCyber AcademyLesson map
Lesson 07 published. Map, example, EX061.
flowchart TD
D["Mr. Patel drafted clauses"] --> N["Two weeks later the contracts are in negotiation"]
N --> Q{"Is there a signed Article 28 contract?"}
Q -->|No| R["Do not add a new flow to that vendor"]
Q -->|Yes| K["Cite the signed contract"]
A draft is a text. A signature is a different fact.
Logical drawing
four vendors
dispensing supplier: terms already present
newsletter tool: terms already present
loyalty firm: standard terms, gap
delivery firm: standard terms, gap
two weeks on
clauses drafted, negotiation open
|
+-- negotiation is not a signature
+-- the dispensing contract does not stand in for loyalty
+-- no new file goes to the loyalty firm on that basis
Learning outcomes
After this chapter, you should be able to:
- Tell a drafted clause apart from a signed Article 28 contract.
- Keep loyalty and delivery as the two gaps while negotiation continues.
- Refuse a new flow to either firm until the signed terms exist.
7.1 The two-week sentence is about negotiation
Chapter 3 found data-protection terms in the dispensing contract and the newsletter contract, and not in the loyalty or delivery standard terms. Mr. Patel drafted the missing clauses. Two weeks later the file says those contracts are in negotiation. A colleague reads the draft and wants a fresh weekly file sent to the loyalty firm. The draft shows what Juniper hopes to sign. It does not show that the firm has signed instructions, confidentiality, security and deletion. Sofia refuses the new file. She does not borrow the dispensing supplier's contract to cover the loyalty firm. This lesson does not invent a signature.
7.2 Worked example
Lesson table; scroll horizontally to read all columns →
| Claim | Document it points at | Decision |
|---|---|---|
| "The clauses have been drafted." | A draft | Keep that fact |
| "Negotiation means we can send the new file." | No signature | Refuse the file |
| "The dispensing contract is close enough." | A different vendor | Refuse the substitution |
| A signed loyalty contract with the four Article 28 duties | Not in the file | Do not pretend it is there |
Synthetic case. No signature date is added for the loyalty firm or the delivery firm.
Errors and limits
Refusing the new file does not cancel the night-time till flow already mapped. That flow stays a known gap until the signed terms exist. This chapter does not assess damages.
Apply
- EX061 — Which paper is the signature? The loyalty clauses sit in a draft, and the two-week note says negotiation. A colleague wants a new weekly file sent to the loyalty firm because the dispensing supplier's contract is already signed. What do you refuse, and which two vendors are still the gaps?
Show marking criteria
Rubric: 3 = refuse the new file; negotiation is not a signature; loyalty and delivery remain the gaps; the dispensing contract does not cover them;; 2 = refuse the file and name the two gaps;; 1 = one of those;; 0 = none.