## Chapter 10 — The social page line stays no-MFA and shared ### Lesson map Lesson 10. Map, example, EX056. ```mermaid flowchart TD A["Print: no MFA: social media shop-page - shared"] --> B["Narrative: helpers join with their own accounts"] B --> C{"Does the print name those helpers?"} C -->|No| D["Keep all staff, and keep the line"] C -->|Yes| E["No helper is named"] ``` Reputation is why the gap ranks third. The rank is not a new laboratory row. ### Logical drawing ```text printed social media, shop-page, all staff, no MFA, shared narrative page helpers on their own accounts shared login removed unnamed the two former helpers ``` ### Learning outcomes After this chapter, you should be able to: 1. Quote the social-page line. 2. Keep the helper change in the narrative. 3. Leave the former helpers unnamed. ### 10.1 A takeover of the page harms reputation. The print still shows the old row. Chapter 3 ranks social media third because a takeover would harm the shop's reputation. On the list the row is `shop-page`, used by all staff, second step false, shared true. The print says `no MFA: social media (shop-page) - shared`. Week four says the service lets people be added as page helpers with their own accounts, and that the shared login is then removed. Two former staff are still listed as helpers in that chapter, and Rosa removes them. The account script does not print those two people, does not print the removal, and does not drop the `no MFA` line. "All staff" stays the user field. Calling the former helpers by name, or printing `shared accounts` without this row, would add facts the run does not contain. The checklist item "MFA on social media" is an after-item on the other script. It is not a rewrite of `shop-page`. ### 10.2 Worked example Keep the page's risk and the page's printed row in separate sentences. | What someone says | Where it lives | Decision | |---|---|---| | "The print shows `shop-page` with no second step, shared." | Account run | May stay | | "A takeover would harm reputation." | Chapter 3 | May stay | | "Helpers moved to their own accounts." | Chapter 4 prose | May stay as prose | | "The two former helpers are named on the print." | No names | Refuse | > **Synthetic case.** The page is a synthetic row. No post is published from this lesson. ### Errors and limits Removing a shared login in the story does not rename `all staff` on the list. The former helpers stay an unnamed pair. ### Apply - **EX056 — What does the social line still say?** The narrative removes the shared social login. What user, second-step flag and shared flag does the account print still show for `shop-page`? *Rubric:* 3 = all staff, no MFA, shared; the helper change stays prose; the former helpers stay unnamed;; 2 = the printed line stays;; 1 = the narrative only;; 0 = none. ### Continue studying — lesson 10 (chapter 10 of 20) [← Chapter 09](#ch-09) · [Course chapter index](../SUBJECTS.md) · [Chapter 11 →](#ch-11) Continue to the next authored lesson. ## Worked answers **EX056.** All staff, no MFA, and shared. The helper change stays prose. The former helpers stay unnamed.