## Chapter 9 — Deleting the zip is not a second print ### Lesson map Lesson 09. Map, example, EX055. ```mermaid flowchart TD Z["old-backup.zip in the export"] --> P["Third failure line"] R["Retention check with Mark"] --> X["Prose: the zip was deleted"] P --> Q{"Does deletion edit the triple?"} X --> Q Q -->|No| K["The line stays"] ``` Removal from storage is not removal from the evidence list. ### Logical drawing ```text still printed: old-backup.zip: anyone-with-link prose only: deleted after the retention check not recorded: a sanitization method, a recycler, a date ``` ### Learning outcomes After this chapter, you should be able to: 1. Keep `old-backup.zip` on the failure list. 2. Place the deletion in the decision log. 3. Refuse a sanitization certificate the file does not contain. ### 9.1 The zip is still the third failure line. `old-backup.zip` is sensitive and set to `anyone-with-link`, so the comprehension prints it. The prose then says the zip came from a previous system, was no longer needed, and was deleted after Mark and the retention rules were checked. That sequence is a log entry. The triple is unchanged, so a reader of the script still sees the third line. Deletion here means the clinic stopped keeping that copy. The page does not name a sanitization method, a tool, a recycler, or a disposal date. A certificate of wiping cannot be copied out of a sentence that never stated one. Fewer copies was the stated reason for removing an unneeded archive, not a measured proof that every other copy was found. The activity-log check before the deletion is also prose. It is not a column beside the triple. Invoices were restricted rather than deleted; that different action must not be collapsed into the zip's story. Both objects remain failure lines in the export. ### 9.2 Worked example | Claim | Where it would have to be | Decision | |---|---|---| | The third line names `old-backup.zip` | The filter output | Keep | | The zip was deleted after a retention check | The log | Keep as prose | | "The script dropped the zip once it was deleted." | No edited list | Refuse | | "A wipe certificate shows the method." | No method is written | Refuse | > **Synthetic case.** Mark is the owner who was consulted. No disposal firm is named. ### Errors and limits Do not describe a wiping procedure. The evidence stops at the export line and the log. ### Apply - **EX055 — Zip versus log.** A classmate removes `old-backup.zip` from the eight triples, prints `shared too widely 2`, and attaches a wipe certificate. What remains true? *Rubric:* 3 = the triple stays; the third failure line stays; deletion stays in the log after the retention check; no method, recycler, or date is printed;; 2 = the line stays and the certificate is refused;; 1 = one point;; 0 = none. ### Continue studying — lesson 09 (chapter 09 of 20) [← Chapter 08](#ch-08) · [Course chapter index](../SUBJECTS.md) · [Chapter 10 →](#ch-10) Continue to the next authored lesson. ## Worked answers **EX055.** `old-backup.zip` stays the third failure line. Deletion after the retention check with Mark stays in the log. No sanitization method, recycler, or disposal date is printed.