## Chapter 19 — The pilot figures are not script columns ### Lesson map Lesson 19. Map, example, EX065. ```mermaid flowchart TD W["Words in the adoption passage"] --> S["Six scripts, none of which print those words"] S --> K["Keep the words in the plan"] K --> R["Do not paint them into a lab line"] ``` A figure can be true of the story and still be absent from every stdout. ### Logical drawing ```text prose, not a column: 10 users, 2,400 drafts, human click to send 30-day retention, review above €500 admin-switch drill in 3 minutes mailboxes T1–T5, dates 12–26 October none of the six scripts prints those tokens ``` ### Learning outcomes After this chapter, you should be able to: 1. List the pilot figures that live only in sentences. 2. Say that the six scripts' prints were already taught in the earlier lessons. 3. Reject a lab line that grows a new field for drafts or euros. ### 19.1 The adoption paragraph records decisions. The scripts record calculations. After the four-week draft-only pilot the prose says 10 users produced 2,400 drafts and that no message was sent by the assistant. Wider use still requires a person to click send. New external domains get a warning. ReceiptSort goes to a person when the amount is above €500 or the confidence is low. The first incident step is an admin switch, and a drill completed that step in 3 minutes. The vendor's answers in the worked example include no training on customer data, 30-day retention, and a switch that blocks external sharing. The written scope names mailboxes T1–T5 and the dates 12–26 October. None of those integers is a format field. Lab S prints Wilson rows, five seed rates, and one bootstrap line. Lab H prints three prefixes and three status words. Lab I prints four defence rows. Lab E prints weights and five eps lines. Lab R prints three bucket lines. Lab B prints nine precision lines. A search of those prints does not find 2400, 500, 3 minutes, a 30-day string, T1, or an October date. The figures still matter. They are the plan. They simply are not measurements the six files computed. Writing `drafts=2400` beside a Wilson row, or `eur=500` beside an eps line, would forge a column. | Figure | Home | Absent from | |---|---|---| | 2,400 drafts | Adoption paragraph | All six prints | | €500 review | ReceiptSort sentence | The eps lines | | 3-minute drill | Incident sentence | The bucket lines | | T1–T5 and 12–26 October | Scope sentence | Every script | ### 19.2 Worked example | Someone adds this to a printout | Decision | |---|---| | `drafts=2400` on the Wilson page | Refuse | | `retention=30` on the hash page | Refuse | | The same numbers, left in the adoption paragraph | Keep | | A new seventh script to "confirm" the drill time | Refuse; the drill is a sentence | > **Synthetic case.** Ten users and 2,400 drafts describe the invented firm. They are not a log extract. ### Errors and limits A round number in a story is memorable, which makes it easy to promote into a column it never occupied. ### Apply - **EX065 — Prose figures.** Which Tallis figures must stay in sentences, and what would a forged column look like? *Rubric:* 3 = 2,400 drafts, ten users, the human click, 30-day retention, €500, the 3-minute drill, T1–T5 and 12–26 October stay prose; none of the six scripts prints them;; 2 = lists the figures and names the scripts;; 1 = one figure;; 0 = writes them into a lab line. ### Continue studying — lesson 19 (chapter 19 of 20) [← Chapter 18](#ch-18) · [Course chapter index](../SUBJECTS.md) · [Chapter 20 →](#ch-20) Continue to the next authored lesson. ## Worked answers **EX065.** Ten users, 2,400 drafts, a human click, 30-day retention, review above €500, a 3-minute drill, mailboxes T1–T5, and 12–26 October are sentences in the plan. None of the six scripts prints them. Putting drafts=2400 on a Wilson line would forge a column.